Press "Enter" to skip to content

4 Comments

  1. Luke
    Luke 29. May 2021.

    This looks like a great idea, could be very helpful in home gardening.
    I have one suggestion – since it’s likely that each plant will need individual watering, why not place the solenoid controller on the sensor board? This way the system would be less cluttered and more straightforward to set up.
    Thank you for sharing the idea by making it open source.
    Keep up the good work

    • Sasa Karanovic
      Sasa Karanovic 29. May 2021.

      Thanks Luke! That’s a great suggestion and I was actually “debating” should I make sensor and actuator into a single unit or separate.
      Main reason for keeping them separate was modularity. Some people may just want to have the sensors and they will water the plants manually, or on the other end, thy just want the actuator and set the system to water the plants on a regular schedule (ie. for plants that don’t require a lot of babysitting).
      Also in my video I try to keep everything visible so people can get a clear idea how system works. But in the final design, because everything is separate; solenoids, tubing, wiring etc. is very well hidden and virtually invisible, and sensors are barely sticking out of the soil. If they were a same unit, keeping everything “clean looking” might be a challenge, at least for me. But I totally get your point.

      In the end it’s a compromise, and I built what I think (hoped) would work best for most people or give them most flexibility/freedom. Obviously this is not a finished product, it’s just one idea/suggestion. ๐Ÿ™‚
      With that said, everything is open-source/open-hardware, so it would be super simple to merge sensor and solenoid into a single board and have that board co-exist with the rest of the system.
      Or to add another type of board that for example turns on LEDs (DC), another one that turns on/off humidifier (AC) and etc. The whole system is very flexible and can be expanded or modified as needed.

      Thank you again for the suggestion! It’s a great idea and I appreciate your feedback!
      Let me know which path you chose for your system and if you decide to build one, please share, I would love to take a look. ๐Ÿ™‚

      • Luke
        Luke 30. May 2021.

        Hi Sasha,
        Thank you for the reply and sharing your design thought process.

        First, I need to mention that my knowledge of PCB design is almost non-existent and I barely managed to even open your design files, so my ideas or suggestions may turn out be technically impossible or impractical…๐Ÿ˜…
        Apologies if that’s the case.

        I fully understand and support the idea of modularity, but I would approach it a bit differently – I’d try to strike a balance between full modularity and common requirements (and I think that solenoid control would be common feature).
        Full modularity (i.e. all functions as separate modules) is great, but sometimes inconvenient as it increases number of modules, connections and overall cost.

        From what I saw on the sensor PCB, there is quite a lot of space on the back and solenoid controller could fit in there as is, or maybe with a slight PCB size increase.
        Ideally, the sensor PCB could be designed in a way where it could be assembled with or without the solenoid controller and related components, depending on the target use case. Such approach may minimally increase the price of the sensor PCB itself, but it also removes the need for a dedicated solenoid controller PCB and reduces overall number of components in the whole system.
        This way you could achieve modularity while at the same time reducing the number of individual module boards.

        What do you think about such approach?

        • Sasa Karanovic
          Sasa Karanovic 31. May 2021.

          You are absolutely right. Both approaches have their pros and cons. While something might be a pro for one person, it might be a con for another and vice-versa. ๐Ÿ™‚

          But with that said, one of many reasons why I release my designs as open-source and open-hardware is that anyone can checkout the design and use it as a starting point for their own personalized design, or use it as-is if they like it.

          Also, one of the goals of this system is to show how easy it is to build a system that has “many” small parts and coordinate them to wok in sync to create a bigger more useful system. Although the system is pretty simple, it would be super easy to, later down the line, design another board(s) that controls the AC, humidifier, lights, dispenses nutrients etc. and that board should work with the existing solution.

          So to summarize; what you are suggesting can easily be done. I’ve opted to keep the sensor and solenoid as separate boards mainly because that works better for my use case, but you can easily merge them into single board. If you decide to do that, please let me know how the end result looks like, I would love to take a look at it. ๐Ÿ™‚

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.